Respectfully, I must disagree. Sean Fraser, P.C., M.P. stated: "Many Canadians have family members who have come to Canada as a visitor, worker, or student and wish to remain permanently in Canada."
This statement can be interpreted in various ways, but it’s important to consider its intent. Fraser indicates that the program was designed for individuals in Canada on a temporary basis who wish to stay permanently. The emphasis is on those who have come to Canada and wish to remain here.
Although it may seem harsh, I believe it is reasonable for IRCC to refuse PR applications from individuals who came to Canada briefly, applied for PR under this program, and then left the country while waiting for a decision. The purpose of the program is to allow Ukrainians with family members in Canada to stay permanently without worrying about renewing work or study permits. It should not be seen as an opportunity to grant PR to individuals who do not intend to reside in Canada.
If someone can stay in Canada, work, and be with their family, but chooses to live elsewhere, the rationale for granting PR becomes questionable. The core objective of reunification is being overlooked if a person decides not to remain in Canada. I find it puzzling why someone would apply for PR without the intention to build a life here, though that’s a separate issue.
Apologies for the lengthy message.
